Theories of john locke and thomas hobbes essay
Compare the views of thomas hobbes and john locke on human nature
He believed the government should have absolute authority over all the citizens. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were both political philosophers who developed theories about how the government should work. For Hobbes and Locke, social contract theory sought to analyze the relationship between rulers and the ruled. Locke and all other natural law theorists assumed that man was by nature a social animal and there fore struck contracts with each other to secure safety among them. Hobbes and Locke did not have many of the same views on government. For the government to have the obedience and loyalty of the citizens, the government must perform certain functions and act appropriately. In particular, and most importantly, they are capable of telling the difference between what is theirs and what belongs to someone else. Although they have several differences, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke do share some of the same beliefs. The social contract theory assumes that "moral obligations of people depend on implicit consensus among individuals to form society" IEP, Friend. Locke is well known philosopher in the scientific and political field, while Hobbes was known for his own political work. This theory important to the two philosophers explains the relationship between the state and the individual.
However their contributions towards state-formation and government seem to start all on a similar basis — the state of nature. Locke knows that political authority as it exists entails a moral inequality that is due to the authority which is exercised by the governing political institution.
The sovereign establishes all the laws, and has complete legislative, judicial, and executive authority. If I interfere in the natural rights of another person, I act against the law of nature and therefore against my own reasonability and the will of God. He believed if such a government did not exist, we would live in a world of turmoil.
Hobbes believed the best way to protect citizens would be to have a sovereign that is intimidating and all-powerful.
The social contract theory was later supported and explained by John Locke. Centuries ago, two political philosophers, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, had two different answers to that particular question.
Although they lived in the same timeframe, their ideas were derived from different events happening during this time.
How did the ideas of john locke and thomas hobbes differ
Their theories are both psychologically insightful, but in nature, they are drastically different. Natural rights can be considered rights of self-ownership. The normative aspect goes hand in hand with universality. Centuries ago, two political philosophers, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, had two different answers to that particular question. Hobbes drew his ideas on man from observation, during a time of civil strife in Europe during the 's and 's. Words: , Paragraphs: 10, Pages: 4 Publication date: July 01, Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website! Initially, Thomas Hobbes introduces a concept on the state of nature and its effects as well as how peace can be achieved. Thomas Hobbs discussed and developed social contract theory through his book Leviathan. In my conclusion I will come back to the hypothesis that the three different states have dissimilar intentions and aim towards different governmental systems. Thomas Hobbes and John Rock are both famous political philosophers and social contractor theorists. Lowe, p. Locke returned from exile in the Netherlands in , after having spent seven years of his life there. In the state of nature every individual is seen as equal to every other individual. This second-order natural right also does not guarantee an objective sentence for the perpetrator. Locke and all other natural law theorists assumed that man was by nature a social animal and there fore struck contracts with each other to secure safety among them.
Some of the most outstanding thinkers include Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. This theory important to the two philosophers explains the relationship between the state and the individual.
Thomas hobbes vs john locke compare and contrast
We lock our cars and houses so that others are physically prevented from having access to what is ours, an observation Hobbes himself makes. The state of nature is a free entity in which no positive law exists; it is free from any form of government. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke is both political scientist who have made strides in the area of social contracts and share being natural law theorist also. I will then compare the states with each other and point out relations and dissimilarities. In, Leviathan, by Thomas Hobbes, and in, The Second Treatise of Government, by John Locke different theories of political legitimacy and definitions of the state of nature are described. Although they do have some similarities, Hobbes and Locke have different views on most of their political arguments, and I will expand on their differences on the state of nature, government, and social contract. A Social Contract is an agreement among the members of a society to cooperate for social benefits. He takes the time to gloss over how power of government should be the most absolute force guiding the public. According to Locke there are only two stable conditions for a political organization: the state of nature and the civil society. Hobbes who was born 40 years before Locke had a very different perspective to Locke and both will be examined more through this essay.
based on 11 review